Week three | RES 811 - Vintage-paper.com

Please the two question with reference 1. Justina Kwapy 13 posts Optional Faith and Learning forum-Week 3 – Scholarly Communication: Process and Style Week 3 – Scholarly Communication: Process and Style Note: Each week, I will post a Bible verse or two that speaks to the conversation for the week. Response posts can be considered “Substantive” if it progresses the conversation and meets the 150 minimal word requirement. Participation in the weekly devotional is completely voluntary. And the Lord answered me: “Write the vision; make it plain on tablets, so he may run who reads it. Habakkuk 2:2 (ESV) In this verse the Lord tells Habakkuk to write his vision and to make it plain enough that those who read will clearly understand the meaning. Clarity of meaning is also the goal of academic writing; we must write to assure that those who read understand what happened and the associated meaning. Does clarity of meaning require over-simplification of language structure and word choice? Why or why not? Do we as followers of Christ who are also the gatekeepers of knowledge and knowledge development have a spiritual obligation to provide clarity of meaning in the writing of academic works? Why or why not? How does your response to the previous question influence your expectations of writing quality in regard to the academic works that you will be producing throughout the doctoral program? 2 One of the biggest obstacles for many students is figuring out what to write. It is problem that has plagued writers for centuries. Please view the following clip from the movie, Finding Forrester, and reflect on the advice that Sean Connory’s character gives to the main character in regards to writing. Do you believe this advice? Speaking from my own experience, there were times that my finished document looked nothing like what my original draft looked like. I found that I just had to get something down on paper and then I was able to rewrite and revise and collect my thoughts. com/watch?v=zLBEFvMkQCo”>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLBEFvMkQCo Please reply to the following with reference 3. Cara DiBona 3 posts Re: Module 3 DQ 1 While scholarly writing is more formal and should have a detached and academic tone to it, the individual writing of the author can vary to give the author a unique authorial voice (Parks-Stamm, 2018). This authorial voice contributes to the formation of their doctoral identity as it is unique to that individual. The ability to create one’s own voice within academic writing can be challenging, but helps scholars avoid plagiarism and makes for a more effective scholarly writer overall (Parks-Stamm, 2018). The iterative process is something that has been brought up in previous chapters of our textbook and is a specific process that provides feedback through peer and advisor reviews along the writing journey (Parks-Stamm, 2018). Embracing this process and being open minded to peer reviews and suggestions is one specific way that I will improve my own academic writing. Another way to improve my own writing will be to read as many academic research articles in my field of study as I can. This will give me the opportunity to become familiar with the academic jargon that occurs in my field of research and therefore write more clearly for my intended audience (Parks-Stamm, 2018). Resource Parks-Stamm, E. (2018). Scholarly writing. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), GCU doctoral research: The purposeful path to a successful dissertation. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/res811/gcu-doctoral-research-the-purposeful-path-to-a-successful-dissertation/v2.1/

Week three | RES 811

Calculate the price
of
your order:

«VPNEW»

Basic features

On-demand options

Paper format

Guaranteed originality

Affordable prices

Best experts

Calculate the price of your order

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away