Introduction Please respond to all four questions associated with this integrative case. These integrative cases are related to topics discussed in the chapters and they also serve as integrated learning vehicles covering materials across several chapters.

Introduction Please respond to all four questions associated with this integrative case. These integrative cases are related to topics discussed in the chapters and they also serve as integrated learning vehicles covering materials across several chapters. Instructions Please read Integrative Case 1 – Globalization of BMW, Rolls-Royce, and the MINI in your book and respond to the four questions at the end of the case. Number the answers and submit them in the Blackboard assignment tab. Please make sure each answer is at least 200 words long. Evaluation Criteria All integrative cases, together, make up 35% of the total course score. This integrative case is worth 35 points. Here is the rubric Download rubricfor this integrative case. Image Source: www.istockphoto.com View Rubric MGT 6204 – Integrative Case Rubric MGT 6204 – Integrative Case Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Identifies and summarizes problem at issue view longer description 7 pts Exemplary Identifies not only the basics of the issue, but recognizes subsidiary, embedded, or implicit aspects of the problem 6 pts Acceptable Identifies the main problem 5 pts Marginal Is confused or identifies a different or inappropriate problem 3 pts Unacceptable Does not identify and summarize the problem / 7 pts Personal perspective and position view longer description 7 pts Exemplary Draws support from experience and information not available from assigned sources 6 pts Acceptable Identifies, appropriately, one’s own position on the issue 5 pts Marginal Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own. 3 pts Unacceptable Does not address a single source or view of the argument. / 7 pts Identify assumptions view longer description 7 pts Exemplary Identifies and questions the validity of the assumptions that underlie the issue 6 pts Acceptable Identifies most of the assumptions 5 pts Marginal Identifies some of the assumptions 3 pts Unacceptable Does not identify the assumptions / 7 pts Quality of evidence view longer description 7 pts Exemplary Evaluates cause and effect relationships and addresses existing or potential consequences. Clearly distinguishes between fact, opinion, and acknowledges value judgments 6 pts Acceptable Examines the evidence and source of evidence, questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, and completeness 5 pts Marginal Merely repeats information provided, taking it as truth or denies evidence without adequate justification 3 pts Unacceptable Does not identify or examine evidence / 7 pts Conclusions, implications, and consequences view longer description 7 pts Exemplary Objectively reflects upon one’s own assertions 6 pts Acceptable Identifies and discusses most issues relating to conclusions, implications, and consequences 5 pts Marginal Identifies and discusses some issues relating to conclusions, implications, and consequences 3 pts Unacceptable Fails to identify conclusions, implications, and consequences of the issue

Calculate the price
of
your order:

«VPNEW»

Basic features

On-demand options

Paper format

Guaranteed originality

Affordable prices

Best experts

Calculate the price of your order

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away